Advertisement!
Author Information Pack
Editorial Board
Submit article
Special Issue
Editor's selection process
Join as Reviewer/Editor
List of Reviewer
Indexing Information
Most popular articles
Purchase Single Articles
Archive
Free Online Access
Current Issue
Recommend this journal to your library
Advertiser
Accepted Articles
Search Articles
Email Alerts
FAQ
Contact Us
Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine and Surgery

Volume  10, Issue 1-2, January – June 2024, Pages 29-33
 

Review Article

Revascularization in Chronic Coronary Disease: A Comparison between AHA/ACC (2023) and ESC/EACTS (2018) Guidelines

Assistant Professor, Department of   CTVS, All India Intitute of Medical Sciences, Raebareli 229405,
Uttar Pradesh, India.
 

Choose an option to locate / access this Article:
days Access
Check if you have access through your login credentials.        PDF      |
|

Open Access: View PDF

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21088/jcms.2454.7123.10(1-2)24.5

Abstract

The treatment of chronic coronary artery disease has evolved over decades. AHA/
ACC and ESC/EACTS periodically review and update their guidelines for same, and
these serve as a reference and guide for medical practitioners all over. Even though
literature and evidence on offer is same, they sometimes differ in certain crucial
aspects. This comparison serves to bring both on same page, allowing the reader to
have a better understanding on the recommendations in particular situation, and the
differences. This is especially true when it comes to left main disease, multivessel
disease and significant left anterior descending artery stenosis. This comparison also
serves to highlight the important role of coronary artery bypass in chronic coronary
artery disease, as well as serving as a quick reference in case of dilemma.
 


Keywords : AHA/ACC Clinical Practice Guidelines; Coronary artery disease; Chronic coronary disease; Syntax score; CABG; PCI.
Corresponding Author : Sankalp,