Advertisement!
Author Information Pack
Editorial Board
Submit article
Special Issue
Editor's selection process
Join as Reviewer/Editor
List of Reviewer
Indexing Information
Most popular articles
Purchase Single Articles
Archive
Free Online Access
Current Issue
Recommend this journal to your library
Advertiser
Accepted Articles
Search Articles
Email Alerts
FAQ
Contact Us
Indian Journal of Pathology: Research and Practice

Volume  8, Issue 2, March-April 2019, Pages 218-222
 

Original Article

Comparison of Various Staining Methods to Detect Helicobacter Pylori

Rashmi Monteiro1, Shivashekar Ganapathy2, Bhuvanamha Devi R.3, Sandhya V.4

1Postgraduate 2Professor and Head 3Assistant Professor 4Professor, Department of Pathology, SRM Medical College Hospital & Research Centre, SRM Nagar, Potheri, Kattankulathur, Kancheepuram, Tamil Nadu 603203, India.

Choose an option to locate / access this Article:
90 days Access
Check if you have access through your login credentials.        PDF      |
|

Open Access: View PDF

DOI: DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21088/ijprp.2278.148X.8219.15

Abstract

 Context: Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) is the major cause of chronic gastritis, peptic ulcer and gastric cancer. It causes varied histological derangements & hence the detection of H. pylori is important. Aims: The study was done to evaluate the efficacy of various stains- Hematoxylin & Eosin (H & E), modified Giemsa and Immunohistochemistry (IHC) in the detection of H. pylori and to correlate the H. pylori positivity with histological changes. Settings and Design: Methods and Material: 100 samples of gastric biopsy & resected specimen were studied with H & E, modified Giemsa and IHC stain. Detection of the organism & associated morphological changes were assessed. The stains were validated using IHC as gold standard. Statistical analysis used: Comparison between the stains were assessed using chi square test. Results: Out of 100 cases, 67 showed positivity with IHC & 58 and 63 were positive with H & E and modified Giemsa respectively. Sensitivity and specificity of H & E was 86.6% and 100% & modified Geimsa was 94% and 100% respectively. Mononuclear infiltrate were noted in 67 cases with H. pylori infection. Similarly in 61 cases with neutrophil activity, 12 cases with atrophy and 4 cases with intestinal metaplasia showed associated H. pylori infection. Conclusions: Modified Geimsa stain is less time consuming, cost effective and easily available when compared to IHC but IHC can detect mild infection, where H & E and modified Giemsa are negative.

Keywords: Gastritis; H. pylori; H & E; Immunohistochemistry; Modified Giemsa.


Corresponding Author : Shivashekar Ganapathy