Advertisement!
Author Information Pack
Editorial Board
Submit article
Special Issue
Editor's selection process
Join as Reviewer/Editor
List of Reviewer
Indexing Information
Most popular articles
Purchase Single Articles
Archive
Free Online Access
Current Issue
Recommend this journal to your library
Advertiser
Accepted Articles
Search Articles
Email Alerts
FAQ
Contact Us
Indian Journal of Anesthesia and Analgesia

Volume  5, Issue 9, September 2018, Pages 1511-1516
 

Original Article

A Comparative Study of Dexmedetomidine HCL and Esmolol HCL for Attenuating Pressor Response to Laryngoscopy and Oral Endotracheal Intubation

Patel Leena1, Kumari Anupama2, Agarwal Misha3, Jayshree Thakkar4, Rathva Chirag5

1Associate Professor 2Third Year Resident 3Junior Lecturer 4Professor 5First year Resident, Department of Anesthesia, Gujarat Cancer & Research Institute (GCRI), Civil Hospital, Ahmedabad, Gujarat 380016, India.

Choose an option to locate / access this Article:
90 days Access
Check if you have access through your login credentials.        PDF      |
|

Open Access: View PDF

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21088/ijaa.2349.8471.5918.13

Abstract

Introduction: Laryngoscopy and intubation increases sympathetic activity resulting in tachycardia and hypertension which may cause myocardial ischemia, cardiac arrhythmias and cerebrovascular hemorrhage. We compared the efficacy of intravenous esmolol and dexmedetomidine to attenuate the pressor response to laryngoscopy and intubation.

Design: Randomised controlled trial.

Method: Seventy-five patients of ASA I and ASA II undergoing general anesthesia with oral intubation for elective surgery were allocated into three groups.Group C: Control group. Group E: intravenous esmolol 2mg/kg three minutes before laryngoscopy. Group D: Intravenous dexmedetomidine 1g/kg in 100ml infusion over ten minutes before laryngoscopy. Heart rate, systolic, diastolic and mean arterial pressures were recorded before drug administration, after drug administration, after induction of standard anesthesia, immediately after intubation, every 2 minutes till 10 minutes. Incidence of bradycardia and hypotension were noted.

Statistical Analysis used: IBM SPSS version.

Results: Mean HR immediately after intubation for group C was (104.57±8.2) whereas it was (83±4.53, 92.6±4.70) for group D and group E with p value of (0.003,0.002) when compared to control group. While comparing group D and E, p value was 0.0001. MAP immediately after intubation for group C was (109±5.9) whereas it was (98±3.4, 100.2±5.2) for group D and E with p value (0.0001, 0.002) when compared to control group. While comparing group D and E, p value was 0.006.

Conclusion: Dexmedetomidine and esmolol both attenuated the pressor response to laryngoscopy and intubation but it was better controlled with dexmedetomidine.

 


Keywords : Pressor Response; Laryngoscopy; Esmolol; Dexmedetomidine.
Corresponding Author : Anupama Kumari, Resident, Department of Anesthesia, Gujarat Cancer & Research Institute (GCRI), Civil Hospital, Ahmedabad, Gujarat 380016, India.