Advertisement!
Author Information Pack
Editorial Board
Submit article
Special Issue
Editor's selection process
Join as Reviewer/Editor
List of Reviewer
Indexing Information
Most popular articles
Purchase Single Articles
Archive
Free Online Access
Current Issue
Recommend this journal to your library
Advertiser
Accepted Articles
Search Articles
Email Alerts
FAQ
Contact Us
Indian Journal of Anesthesia and Analgesia

Volume  5, Issue 8, August 2018, Pages 1382-1389
 

Original Article

A Comparative Study of the Effect of 0.5% Hyperbaric Bupivacaine and 0.5% Isobaric Levobupivacaine on Spinal Anaesthesia in Patients Scheduled for Lower Abdominal Surgeries

V. Shanmugapriya1, Deepa David2, Anandhakumar G.3, N. Anuradha4

1-4Assistant Professor, Dept. of Anaesthesiology, Government Stanley Medical College and Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600001, India.

Choose an option to locate / access this Article:
90 days Access
Check if you have access through your login credentials.        PDF      |
|

Open Access: View PDF

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21088/ijaa.2349.8471.5818.21

Abstract

Introduction: Recent advances in pharmacology introduced newer local anaesthestic drugs which can be used in subarachnoid block with less motor blockade and less effect on bladder had changed the patient care from prolonged hospital stay to day care.

Aim: This study is to compare the efficacy of 0.5% hyperbaric Bupivacaine and 0.5% isobaric Levo-bupivacaine on spinal anaesthesia, in patients scheduled for Lower Abdominal Surgeries.

Materials and Methods: The study is a randomized control study, including 2 groups of 40 patients each group B and L. group B studied with 3ml of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine, group L studied with 3ml of levo bupivacaine.

Results: Levobupivacaine has more delayed onset of both sensory and motor blockade with more time taken to attain maximum sensory level and faster two segment regression and lesser duration of both sensory and motor block when compared with the bupivacine when the hemodynamic parameters were compared with the two groups, the decrease in HR < 20% of the baseline was not significant in both groups. The decrease in SBP <20% of base line  5/40, levo bupivacaine no fall in SBP/DBP. Adverse effects like bradycardia, shivering, vomiting was not seen in the two groups when compared.

Conclusion: Levobupivacaine has more hemodynamic stability, delayed onset of action and shorter duration of anesthesia than 0.5% Hyperbaric Bupivacaine with comparable duration of motor blockade.


Keywords : Spinal Anaesthesia; Levobupivacaine; Bupivacaine; Sensory Blockade; Motorblockade; Hemodynamics.
Corresponding Author : Deepa David, Assistant Professor, Dept. of Anaesthesiology, Government Stanley Medical College and Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600001, India.