Advertisement!
Author Information Pack
Editorial Board
Submit article
Special Issue
Editor's selection process
Join as Reviewer/Editor
List of Reviewer
Indexing Information
Most popular articles
Purchase Single Articles
Archive
Free Online Access
Current Issue
Recommend this journal to your library
Advertiser
Accepted Articles
Search Articles
Email Alerts
FAQ
Contact Us
Indian Journal of Pathology: Research and Practice

Volume  7, Issue 1, January 2018, Pages 75-79
 

Original Article

Clinicopathological Evaluation of Various Prognostic Factors in Breast Cancer Along with Hormonal Receptor Status and HER2/neu Expression

Shashidhar M.R.*, Sushma H.M.**

*Assistant Professor, Dept. of Pathology, Yenepoya Medical College, Mangalore, Karnataka 575022, India. **Assistant Professor, Dept. of Pathology, A.J Institute of Medical Sciences, Mangalore, Karnataka 575004, India.

Choose an option to locate / access this Article:
90 days Access
Check if you have access through your login credentials.        PDF      |
|

Open Access: View PDF

DOI: DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21088/ijprp.2278.148X.7118.13

Abstract

Introduction: The prevalence of hormone receptor positive breast cancer in Asian countries is found to be lower than the western world where more than 50% of the tumors express hormone receptors. Studies have found consecutive decrease of ER, PR expression as a measure of differentiation of the tumour with low grade having the highest and high grade having the lowest ER/PR expression. Detection of vascular invasion in the primary tumor is a marker of metastatic potential and has prognostic significance, particularly in the lymph node negative group and helps to predict both recurrence and long-term survival. Aims and Objectives: To study the expression of ER, PR and HER2/neu status by immunohistochemistry and correlation of clinicopathological parameters with hormone receptor status and HER2/neu expression. Results: In the present study the age range of the patients was between 35-80 years. Out of 53 cases, majority (72%) of them were invasive ductal carcinoma. Other tumors included medullary carcinoma, lobular carcinoma, metastatic carcinoma and poorly differentiated carcinoma. Nineteen out of 53 tumors (36% of the cases) showed triple negativity and only one tumor showed triple positivity. Of the total cases 32% of the tumors were ER+/PR+, 17 % ER+/PR- and 4% showed ER-/PR+. Conclusion: This study highlights the importance of various prognostic factors and hormone receptor status evaluation that will aid in therapeutic intervention.

Keywords: Breast Cancer; ER; PR; HER2/neu; Lymphovascular. 


Corresponding Author : Sushma H.M., Assistant Professor, Dept. of Pathology, A.J Institute of Medical Sciences, Mangalore, Karnataka 575004, India.