Advertisement!
Author Information Pack
Editorial Board
Submit article
Special Issue
Editor's selection process
Join as Reviewer/Editor
List of Reviewer
Indexing Information
Most popular articles
Purchase Single Articles
Archive
Free Online Access
Current Issue
Recommend this journal to your library
Advertiser
Accepted Articles
Search Articles
Email Alerts
FAQ
Contact Us
Indian Journal of Anesthesia and Analgesia

Volume  4, Issue 2, April - June 2017, Pages 708-713
 

Original Article

Efficacy of Laryngoscopy and Haemodynamic Response to Endotracheal Intubation: A Comparative Study between Airtraq Optical Laryngoscope and Macintosh Laryngoscope

Raghavendra Babu T.1, Anup N.R.2

1Assistant Professor, 2Senior Resident, Department of Anaesthesiology, JSS Medical College and Hospital, Mysuru, Karnataka 570015, India.

Choose an option to locate / access this Article:
90 days Access
Check if you have access through your login credentials.        PDF      |
|

Open Access: View PDF

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21088/ijaa.2349.8471.4217.16

Abstract

Background: Laryngoscopy is the most important step in the process of endotracheal intubation for administration of general anaesthesia. Airtraq optical laryngoscope is a new rigid indirect optical device with exaggerated curvature of the blade and an internal arrangement of optical components, a view of the glottis is provided without alignment of oral, pharyngeal and tracheal axes. Objective: To compare the efficacy of laryngoscopy and the haemodynamic response to endotracheal intubation between Airtraq and Macintosh laryngoscopes. Methods: One hundred patients of either sex in the age of 20–60 years under ASA grade I and II with Mallampati grading I and II posted for elective surgery under general anaesthesia were selected for the study. Patients were randomly divided into two groups (n = 50). Induction of anaesthesia was standardized. The efficacy of laryngoscopy was compared according to Cormack and Lehane grading and haemodynamic response to endotracheal intubation were compared. Results: In group A (Airtraq), all 50 (100%) patients had Cormack and Lehane grading I and in group M (Macintosh), 33 (66%) patients had Cormack and Lehane grading I and 17 (36%) patients had Cormack and Lehane grading II ( p = 0.000). In x Group A, mean heart rate increased from 83.54±10.19 bpm prior to intubation to 90.08±9.98 bpm after intubation and mean arterial pressure increased from 91.06±8.16 mmHg prior to intubation to 95.30±8.40 mmHg after intubation. In Group M, mean heart rate increased from 80.94±6.71 bpm prior to intubation to 103.30±7.86 bpm after intubation and mean arterial pressure increased from 91.80±7.70 mmHg prior to intubation to 114.20±6.69 mmHg after intubation (p = 0.000). Conclusion: Airtraq optical laryngoscope provides a better exposure of the glottis when compared to Macintosh laryngoscope while triggering minimum haemodynamic response to endotracheal intubation.

Keywords: Laryngoscopy; Hemodynamics; Airtraq; Macintosh. 


Corresponding Author : Raghavendra Babu T., 401, Manasa enclave, GSSV Road, Lakshmipuram, Mysuru-570004, Karnataka, India.