Advertisement!
Author Information Pack
Editorial Board
Submit article
Special Issue
Editor's selection process
Join as Reviewer/Editor
List of Reviewer
Indexing Information
Most popular articles
Purchase Single Articles
Archive
Free Online Access
Current Issue
Recommend this journal to your library
Advertiser
Accepted Articles
Search Articles
Email Alerts
FAQ
Contact Us
Indian Journal of Pathology: Research and Practice

Volume  5, Issue 2, May-Aug 2016, Pages 97-105
 

Original Article

To Study the Diagnostic Utility of a Revised Protocol Comprising of Routine Histology, Myelin Stain, Anti-Neurofilament Immunostain and Electron Microscopy in Evaluation of Nerve Biopsies from Patients with Peripheral Neuropathies

Rigvardhan*, Manvir Singh Tevatia**, Adwait Sodani***, Bishakha Deb****, Prabal Deb*****

*Assistant Professor, Command Hospital, Lucknow. **Professor, Army College of Medical Sciences, New Delhi. ***Medical Officer, Armed Forces. ****Medical Student, Topiwala National Medical College, Mumbai. *****Professor, Department of Pathology, Army

Choose an option to locate / access this Article:
90 days Access
Check if you have access through your login credentials.        PDF      |
|

Open Access: View PDF

DOI: DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21088/ijprp.2278.148X.5216.4

Abstract

 Background: Although major progresses have been made in the diagnostic approaches of peripheral neuropathy in past ten years, 25 to 40% of patients remain undiagnosed. Recently, with use of immunohistochemical (IHC) and ultrastructural techniques, the diagnostic yield has enhanced. The aim of this study was to study the diagnostic utility of incorporating myelin stain, antiNeurofilament (NF) immunostain and ultrastructural evaluation in comparison with routine histological stains, to establish an optimal diagnostic protocol for workup of neuropathies. Methods: Thirty four nerve biopsies received from patients with neuropathies were included with relevant clinical and electrophysiological information. In all the cases, nerve biopsy tissue submitted for evaluation was processed for light microscopic (LM), histochemistry using Luxolfast blue (LFB) myelin stain, and IHC using antiNF antibody. In 15 cases, an additional bit was received in saline/3% glutaraldehyde for electron microscopic (EM) examination. Statistical analysis was performed using Epi Info 3.5.3 software (CDC, Atlanta, 2008) for definitive correlation. Results: Overall the diagnostic yield was 46.7% with morphology alone but when combined with LFB stain combined was 73.3% (p<0.05). Combined diagnostic yield of H&E with NF was 17 cases (56.7%) (p>0.05). On evaluating the combined efficacy of LFB, NFIHC and EM in comparison to routine staining using hematoxylin and eosin, it was observed that 21 biopsies (70%) were abnormal of which 10 were missed on routine examination (p<0.05). Conclusion: This study highlights that large number of cases and the spectrum of nerve pathologies that were otherwise missed owing to evaluation by routine histology alone can be diagnosed using a protocol which combines myelin stain, IHC with NF, and at least assessing semithin sections, for optimal workup of nerve biopsies. Since proper evaluation and accurate diagnosis have direct therapeutic and prognostic connotations, it is imperative that diagnostic centres evolve diagnostic protocol combining the above methodologies.

Keywords: Diagnostic Yield; Immunohistochemistry; Nerve Biopsy; Ultrastructure.


Corresponding Author : Prabal Deb*****