Advertisement!
Author Information Pack
Editorial Board
Submit article
Special Issue
Editor's selection process
Join as Reviewer/Editor
List of Reviewer
Indexing Information
Most popular articles
Purchase Single Articles
Archive
Free Online Access
Current Issue
Recommend this journal to your library
Advertiser
Accepted Articles
Search Articles
Email Alerts
FAQ
Contact Us
Indian Journal of Anesthesia and Analgesia

Volume  10, Issue 4, October-December 2023, Pages 151-159
 

Original Article

Comparison of Ultrasound Guided Single Injection Infraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block Using Bupivacaine Alone and Bupivacaine Combined with Dexmedetomidine for Pain Control in Upper Limb Surgeries

Saraswathi Nagappa , Pooja Patil , Mohsina Yasmeen , Sumaiya Sabreen

1,3,4 Assistant Professor, 2 Post Graduate, Department of Anesthesiology, Bangalore Medical College and Research Institute, Bangalore 560002, Karnataka, India.

Choose an option to locate / access this Article:
90 days Access
Check if you have access through your login credentials.        PDF      |
|

Open Access: View PDF

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21088/ijaa.2349.8471.10423.2

Abstract

Background: Infraclavicular brachial plexus blockade provides anesthesia for surgeries of upper limb. In contrast to interscalene and supraclavicular block, infraclavicular blockade has the advantage of minimal risk to intravertebral, intrathecal or epidural injection, as well as reduced incidence of phrenic nerve and stellate ganglion block.

Aim: To evaluate the effect of dexmedetomidine with bupivacaine on the onset and duration of sensory and motor block and duration of analgesia in infraclavicular blocks.

Methodology: A prospective, double blind, randomized control trial was conducted among 50 patients under going elective surgery of hand, for earm, elbow and distal humerus. Patients were randomly divided into two groups based on random numbers generated by a computer program (www.randomwqqqizer.org). Group A consisted 25 patients received block with bupivacaine + dexmedetomidine Group A and Group B consisted 25 patients received block with bupivacaine + 20 ml normal saline. This study compared Onset and duration of sensory and motor blockade, duration of analgesia, post-operative pain score and hemodynamic parameters between the two groups.

Results: There was significant difference in mean onset of sensory block between two groups, (Group A 9.20 ± 0.98 vs Group B 11.06 ± 1.24 min p value < 0.001. Similarly there was significant difference in mean onset of Motor blockade between two groups (Group A 10.66 ± 1.06 min vs Group B 11.80 ± 1.10 min p value < 0.001). There was a statistically significant longer duration of sensory block (Group A was 8.88 ± 1.04 hrs and in Group B was 7.60 ± 0.78 hrs, p value <0.001), longer duration of motor block (Group A was 7.79 ± 0.82 Hrs vs Group B was 6.62 ± 0.49 hrs p value < 0.001). Statistically significant longer duration of motor block

(Group A was 9.78 ± 0.73 vs Group B 6.99 ± 1.10 hrs p value < 0.001.

Conclusion: Dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant hastens the onset and prolongs the duration of both sensory and motor block and has better analgesia when compared to bupivacaine alone.


Keywords : Dexmedetomidine; Upper Limb; Infrac-lavicular.
Corresponding Author : Sumaiya Sabreen, Assistant Professor, Department of Anesthesiology, Bangalore Medical College and Research Institute, Bangalore 560002, Karnataka, India.