Advertisement!
Author Information Pack
Editorial Board
Submit article
Special Issue
Editor's selection process
Join as Reviewer/Editor
List of Reviewer
Indexing Information
Most popular articles
Purchase Single Articles
Archive
Free Online Access
Current Issue
Recommend this journal to your library
Advertiser
Accepted Articles
Search Articles
Email Alerts
FAQ
Contact Us
New Indian Journal of Surgery

Volume  15, Issue 1, January - March 2024, Pages 37-41
 

Case Report

A Comparative Study of Early Versus Delayed Ileostomy Closure Following Bowel Surgery

Inderjeet1, Alankar Sharma2, Manohar L. Dawan3, Abhishek Chhabra4, Sunder kishore5, Sanjay Lodha6

1,23rd Year Resident, 3Professor &
Unit Head, 4-6Assistant Professor, Department of Surgery,
Sardar Patel Medical College & AGH, Bikaner, Rajasthan
334001, India.

Choose an option to locate / access this Article:
90 days Access
Check if you have access through your login credentials.        PDF      |
|

Open Access: View PDF

DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.21088/nijs.0976.4747.15124.4

Abstract

Introduction: Diversion stoma is very common in surgical practice.

Aim: To compare the complications following early versus delayed ileostomy closure following bowel surgeries.

Methods: This was a Hospital based comparative study on 112 patients undergoing ileostoma closure following bowel surgery from, March 2023 to February 2024 at Department of Surgery, S.P. Medical College and P.B.M Hospital, Bikaner. Patients of each gender with age >18 years, temporary loop ileostomy and temporary double barrel ileostomy of any aetiology, medically and mentally fit to undergo early stoma closure were included.

Results: Mean age of group A (Early stoma closure) was 41.54±16.56 and group B (Delayed stoma closure) was 47.6±16.13. (p=0.066). Out of total 37 patients of Group A maximum 16 (43.24%) patients had intestinal perforation, as indication of stoma creation, whereas in Group B maximum 37 (49.33%) patients had intestinal perforation, as indication of stoma creation. (p>0.05). Mean time operative time for stoma closure of group A was 71.16±5.05 and group B was 75.70±7.73. (p<0.001). In Group A, 2 (5.40%) patients died whereas 6(8%) died in group B.

Conclusion: it is preffered to EARLY STOMA CLOSURE as per patients fitness for stoma closure over unnecessarily DELAYED.


Keywords : Early Stoma Closure; Delayed Stoma Closure; Ileostomy Closure.
Corresponding Author : Manohar L. Dawan