Advertisement!
Author Information Pack
Editorial Board
Submit article
Special Issue
Editor's selection process
Join as Reviewer/Editor
List of Reviewer
Indexing Information
Most popular articles
Purchase Single Articles
Archive
Free Online Access
Current Issue
Recommend this journal to your library
Advertiser
Accepted Articles
Search Articles
Email Alerts
FAQ
Contact Us
New Indian Journal of Surgery

Volume  15, Issue 1, January - March 2024, Pages 7-10
 

Original Article

Study of Outcome of Diathermic Incision Cautery more than 5 cms in General and Urologic Surgery Operations

Sheetal Patil1, Sanjay P Dhangar2, Ketan Karande3

1Associate Professor, 3Junior
Resident, Department of Surgery, SMBT Institute of
Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Dhamangaon,
Ghoti, Igatpuri, Nashik 422403, Maharashtra, India,
2Assistant Professor, Department of Urology, Bharti
Hospital & Research Centre Dhankawadi, Pune,
Maharashtra-411043, India.

Choose an option to locate / access this Article:
90 days Access
Check if you have access through your login credentials.        PDF      |
|

Open Access: View PDF

DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.21088/nijs.0976.4747.15124.1

Abstract

Introduction: Cutting diathermy is a more recent alternative to scalpel for surgical incisions. Its use was limited due to fear of increased risk of infection, impair healing and decrease cosmesis. However, recent studies suggest otherwise, claiming that diathermy may offer potential advantages with respect to blood loss, incision time and post-operative pain. The aim of this study was thus to evaluate the outcome of diathermic incision in terms of healing, post-op pain and scar characteristics in operations with incisions more than 5 cm in size.

Materials & Methods: A hospital based observational study included 182 cases scheduled to undergo surgery requiring more than approximately 5 cm of incision. Cases were operated by surgeons who have a minimum of 3 years of experience. Incision time, wound healing, post-op pain and scar characteristics were noted at discharge and follow up at 7th and 30th day.

Results: Mean incision time was 24.5 seconds with almost half of the cases (48.9%) had incision time between 20-30 seconds. A significant improvement was observed in all cases regarding mean Southampton wound score and pain score from day of discharge till day 30th of follow up. A significant improvement was also observed in patient and observer scar assessment scale in all the sub categories from day of discharge till day 30th of follow up None of the cases complaint of any surgical site infections or scar related complications.

Conclusion: Electrocautery can be considered as effective and safe in making large skin incision. It is associated with less incision time, faster healing, low post-operative pain and good scar characteristics.


Keywords : Diathermy; Scar Cosmesis; Surgical Incisions; Wound Healing.
Corresponding Author : Sanjay P Dhangar,